Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed

[rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Jaime

This is a good idea! I had a briefing from Liz when I first join but I didn't 
realise my brain would turn to mush....and I would forget everything so 
quickly!!

Rosemary
Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus

-----Original Message-----
From: "Liz Gasster" <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:00:51 
To: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jaime Wagner<jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
<gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT:  Step 1 Completed

Yes, this can be done quite promptly – within just a few days.  Liz 
  
 
 
From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
 Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:09 PM
 To: Jaime Wagner; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
 Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed 
  
Good idea Jaime.  Maybe Liz could ask the Staff support person for each one to 
draft a brief description that could be provided as an appendix.  This will be 
even more needed once the Council provides a report to the public regarding any 
final prioritization done. 
  
Chuck 
  
 
----------------
 
From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jaime Wagner
 Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:17 PM
 To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
 Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed 
Congratulations to all. 
  
I would appreciate a high level description of each project, because even 
though its number has diminished, I still don’t feel assured to develop a 
proper judgment on relative value. 
  
Is this a particular disfunction of mine or maybe it applies also to other 
newcomers to the Council? 
  
  
 
Jaime Wagner
 j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>              
+55(51)8126-0916
 skype: jaime_wagner 
  
 
 
From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ken Bour
 Sent: sexta-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2009 13:32
 To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed 
  
Work Prioritization Model DT: 
  
During today’s teleconference (3 Dec 2009), the Work Team completed Step 1 as 
outlined in Liz’s email from 23 November.  The following table shows the 
revised list of projects (and revised abbreviations in red) that will be 
rated/ranked and ultimately prioritized. 
  
Active Project List 
  
 
Seq No. 
Name 
Abbreviation 
 
 
1 
New gTLDs-Special Trademark Issues 
STI 
 
 
2 
IDN Fast Track Implementation Plan 
IDNF 
 
3 
Geo Regions Review Communitywide WG 
GEO 
 
4 
Travel Policy 
TRAV 
 
5 
Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery 
PED 
 
6 
Registration Abuse Policy WG 
ABUS 
 
7 
Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN WG 
JIG 
 
8 
PPSC-PDP Work Team 
PDP 
 
9 
PPSC-WG Work Team 
WG 
 
10 
OSC-GNSO Operations Team 
GCOT 
 
11 
OSC-Constituency & Stakeholder Operations Team 
CSG 
 
12 
OSC-Communications & Coordination Work Team 
CCT 
 
 
13 
IRTP – Part B PDP 
IRTB 
 
 
14 
Registrar Accreditation Agreement 
RAA 
 
15 
Internationalized Registration Data WG 
IRD 
 
  
The following projects were removed from the original list for one of three 
reasons (ref. “Category” column), but will be maintained in a separate table so 
that the team does not lose track of them: 
  
1)      Community Inactive (“I”):  the work effort is waiting on or pending 
another action (e.g. Staff report) or decision  (e.g. Council motion) and is 
not currently consuming community resources. 
2)      Monitor Only (“M”) :  the work effort is not fundamentally prioritized 
by the Council, but it does maintain an interest from an informational 
perspective (Note: also includes liaison activities). 
3)      Not a GNSO Project (“X”):  the work effort is not or not yet a GNSO 
initiative and cannot be properly evaluated (ranked/rated) and prioritized by 
the Council. 
  
 
Category 
Name 
Abbreviation 
 
I 
WHOIS Studies 
WHO1 
 
I 
Fast Flux 
FF 
 
I 
Synthesis of WHOIS Service Requirements 
WHO2 
 
M 
GNSO Constituency Reconfirmations 
GCR 
 
X 
Registry/Registrar Vertical Integration 
RRVI 
  
The three category explanations above may need tweaking, but I hope I captured 
the essence of the team’s discussion accurately. 
  
To make it easier to track and respond, I will create new email threads for 
each separate task.  
  
Congratulations on completing Step 1! 
  
Ken Bour