RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My brain still turns to mush and I have been around from the beginning.
:)
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 2:39 AM
        To: Liz Gasster; owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Gomes, Chuck;
Jaime Wagner; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed
        
        
        Jaime
        
        This is a good idea! I had a briefing from Liz when I first join
but I didn't realise my brain would turn to mush....and I would forget
everything so quickly!!
        
        Rosemary 

        Sent from my BlackBerry(r) from Optus

________________________________

        From: "Liz Gasster" <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx> 
        Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:00:51 +1100
        To: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jaime
Wagner<jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
        Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed


        Yes, this can be done quite promptly - within just a few days.
Liz

         

        From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:09 PM
        To: Jaime Wagner; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed

         

        Good idea Jaime.  Maybe Liz could ask the Staff support person
for each one to draft a brief description that could be provided as an
appendix.  This will be even more needed once the Council provides a
report to the public regarding any final prioritization done.

         

        Chuck

                 

                
________________________________


                From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaime Wagner
                Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:17 PM
                To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed

                Congratulations to all.

                 

                I would appreciate a high level description of each
project, because even though its number has diminished, I still don't
feel assured to develop a proper judgment on relative value. 

                 

                Is this a particular disfunction of mine or maybe it
applies also to other newcomers to the Council?

                 

                 

                Jaime Wagner
                j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx             

                +55(51)8126-0916
                skype: jaime_wagner

                 

                From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Bour
                Sent: sexta-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2009 13:32
                To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed

                 

                Work Prioritization Model DT:

                 

                During today's teleconference (3 Dec 2009), the Work
Team completed Step 1 as outlined in Liz's email from 23 November.  The
following table shows the revised list of projects (and revised
abbreviations in red) that will be rated/ranked and ultimately
prioritized.

                 

                Active Project List

                 

Seq No.

Name

Abbreviation

                        
1

New gTLDs-Special Trademark Issues

STI

                        
2

IDN Fast Track Implementation Plan

IDNF

3

Geo Regions Review Communitywide WG

GEO

4

Travel Policy 

TRAV

5

Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery

PED

6

Registration Abuse Policy WG

ABUS

7

Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN WG

JIG

8

PPSC-PDP Work Team

PDP

9

PPSC-WG Work Team

WG

10

OSC-GNSO Operations Team

GCOT

11

OSC-Constituency & Stakeholder Operations Team

CSG

12

OSC-Communications & Coordination Work Team

CCT

                        
13

IRTP - Part B PDP

IRTB

                        
14

Registrar Accreditation Agreement

RAA

15

Internationalized Registration Data WG

IRD

                        

                 

                The following projects were removed from the original
list for one of three reasons (ref. "Category" column), but will be
maintained in a separate table so that the team does not lose track of
them:

                 

                1)      Community Inactive ("I"):  the work effort is
waiting on or pending another action (e.g. Staff report) or decision
(e.g. Council motion) and is not currently consuming community
resources.

                2)      Monitor Only ("M") :  the work effort is not
fundamentally prioritized by the Council, but it does maintain an
interest from an informational perspective (Note: also includes liaison
activities).

                3)      Not a GNSO Project ("X"):  the work effort is
not or not yet a GNSO initiative and cannot be properly evaluated
(ranked/rated) and prioritized by the Council.

                 

Category

Name

Abbreviation

I

WHOIS Studies

WHO1

I

Fast Flux 

FF

I

Synthesis of WHOIS Service Requirements

WHO2

M

GNSO Constituency Reconfirmations

GCR

X

Registry/Registrar Vertical Integration

RRVI

                 

                The three category explanations above may need tweaking,
but I hope I captured the essence of the team's discussion accurately.

                 

                To make it easier to track and respond, I will create
new email threads for each separate task.  

                 

                Congratulations on completing Step 1!

                 

                Ken Bour