<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (In Progress)
- To: Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (In Progress)
- From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:57:46 -0300
Thanks Ken for considering my comment abut "cost", this word at least for me
has usually a close link to money cost meaning.
I like better the "*X – Resource/Time/Energy Consumption" approach.
Olga
*
2009/12/9 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Team Members:
>
>
>
> We have a conference call scheduled for tomorrow, 10 Dec at 2000 UTC.
>
>
>
> As I review the list traffic, we are still working on Step 2. To summarize
> progress to-date, we may be very close, if not completed, with the Y-axis
> definition. The latest version is shown below:
>
>
>
> *Y – Value/Benefit … *this dimension relates to perceptions of net overall
> effectiveness, productivity, and gain to: 1) the global Internet community;
> and 2) ICANN stakeholders. Components of value/benefit might include: new
> opportunities for Internet growth/expansion, enhanced competitiveness,
> resolution/improvement of serious performance or infrastructure problems,
> increased security/stability, and improved user experience.
>
>
>
> In my Step 2 summary report of our last call (email 4 Dec), I suggested a
> new name/title and definition for the X-axis (below) aimed at addressing
> Olga’s concern about “cost.”
>
>
>
> *X – Resource/Time/Energy Consumption … this dimension relates to
> perceptions of total human capital expenditure anticipated and also
> includes such factors as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many
> moving parts to coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing
> interests), length of time needed/expected; availability/scarcity of
> resources -- all of which contribute to the overall resource consumption
> required to develop a recommendation. *
>
> Do team members have any thoughts on this recommendation?
>
>
>
> At the conclusion of our next call, if not beforehand, we would like to
> have Step 2 completed.
>
>
>
> In a separate email, I will begin to outline some thoughts as to how we
> might proceed with Step 3.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|