ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-wpm-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (In Progress)

  • To: Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (In Progress)
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:57:46 -0300

Thanks Ken for considering my comment abut "cost", this word at least for me
has usually a close link to money cost meaning.
I like better the "*X – Resource/Time/Energy Consumption" approach.
Olga
*
2009/12/9 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Team Members:
>
>
>
> We have a conference call scheduled for tomorrow, 10 Dec at 2000 UTC.
>
>
>
> As I review the list traffic, we are still working on Step 2.  To summarize
> progress to-date, we may be very close, if not completed, with the Y-axis
> definition.  The latest version is shown below:
>
>
>
> *Y – Value/Benefit … *this dimension relates to perceptions of net overall
> effectiveness, productivity, and gain to:  1) the global Internet community;
> and 2) ICANN stakeholders.  Components of value/benefit might include:  new
> opportunities for Internet growth/expansion, enhanced competitiveness,
> resolution/improvement of serious performance or infrastructure problems,
> increased security/stability, and improved user experience.
>
>
>
> In my Step 2 summary report of our last call (email 4 Dec), I suggested a
> new name/title and definition for the X-axis (below) aimed at addressing
> Olga’s concern about “cost.”
>
>
>
> *X – Resource/Time/Energy Consumption … this dimension relates to
> perceptions of total human capital expenditure anticipated and also
> includes such factors as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many
> moving parts to coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing
> interests), length of time needed/expected; availability/scarcity of
> resources -- all of which contribute to the overall resource consumption
> required to develop a recommendation.  *
>
> Do team members have any thoughts on this recommendation?
>
>
>
> At the conclusion of our next call, if not beforehand, we would like to
> have Step 2 completed.
>
>
>
> In a separate email, I will begin to outline some thoughts as to how we
> might proceed with Step 3.
>
>
>
> Ken
>



-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy