Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] Today's 6 April Teleconference

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ken for the documents.
I geneal I am ok with both and look forward to hearing other comments.
I also like what Chuck suggested about inviting Philipp to our meeting and
discuss about this before taking any action with the OSC.
Regards
Olga

2010/4/6 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> WPM Team Members:
>
>
>
> I have attached two Word documents that will also be uploaded to the Adobe
> Connect room (as PDFs) at *
> http://icann.na3.acrobat.com/gnsowprioritization/.  *
>
> * *
>
> 1)      Section 6 + Annex are almost the same as I sent to the team on 29
> March (KBv6).   Chuck’s suggestion for a wording change to 2.3.2 was
> incorporated.   I don’t believe that there were any additional comments on
> the combined document during the past week.   The changes from the last
> teleconference continue to be redlined so that they will be pretty easy to
> walk through if that is the team’s desire.  My transmittal email outlined
> which sections were amended.
>
>
>
> 2)      The Cover Letter now includes the consolidated replacement for
> paragraphs 1 & 2 that I submitted to the list on 30 March (per Chuck’s
> request) as well as Jaime’s suggestions for the penultimate paragraph
> (redlined).
>
>
>
> Hopefully, we can finalize and approve both documents in today’s session
> and also discuss what, if anything, needs to be done in preparation for the
> Council meeting on 21 April.   A few considerations that occurred to me are
> repeated below with Chuck’s comments in blue text:
>
>
>
> ·         Training considerations?
>
> ·         When should the Council undertake its first prioritization?   
> [Gomes,
> Chuck]  I suggest that our goal should be to submit our proposal for Council
> consideration in the 21 April Council meeting and this question should be
> asked in that meeting with any recommendations we might like to make.
>
> ·         As I mentioned on today’s call, the GCOT was assigned the
> following task in its Charter:
>
> “Determine what steps are needed to establish the role of the Council as a
> ‘strategic manager’ of the policy process.”
> Does the DT want to make a recommendation to the OSC and Council as to
> which team, if not itself, should be tasked with developing the “managerial”
> elements that would effectively utilize the prioritizations?  [Gomes,
> Chuck]  What about inviting Philip Sheppard (OSC Chair) and/or Ray Fassett
> (GCOT) chair to our next meeting to discuss this.  If we do that,
> we probably should send them the documents for their review before the
> meeting so that they understand the context for that meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
> Ken Bour
>
>
>