[gnso-wpm-dt] Today's 6 April Teleconference
WPM Team Members: I have attached two Word documents that will also be uploaded to the Adobe Connect room (as PDFs) at http://icann.na3.acrobat.com/gnsowprioritization/. 1) Section 6 + Annex are almost the same as I sent to the team on 29 March (KBv6). Chuck's suggestion for a wording change to 2.3.2 was incorporated. I don't believe that there were any additional comments on the combined document during the past week. The changes from the last teleconference continue to be redlined so that they will be pretty easy to walk through if that is the team's desire. My transmittal email outlined which sections were amended. 2) The Cover Letter now includes the consolidated replacement for paragraphs 1 & 2 that I submitted to the list on 30 March (per Chuck's request) as well as Jaime's suggestions for the penultimate paragraph (redlined). Hopefully, we can finalize and approve both documents in today's session and also discuss what, if anything, needs to be done in preparation for the Council meeting on 21 April. A few considerations that occurred to me are repeated below with Chuck's comments in blue text: . Training considerations? . When should the Council undertake its first prioritization? [Gomes, Chuck] I suggest that our goal should be to submit our proposal for Council consideration in the 21 April Council meeting and this question should be asked in that meeting with any recommendations we might like to make. . As I mentioned on today's call, the GCOT was assigned the following task in its Charter: "Determine what steps are needed to establish the role of the Council as a 'strategic manager' of the policy process." Does the DT want to make a recommendation to the OSC and Council as to which team, if not itself, should be tasked with developing the "managerial" elements that would effectively utilize the prioritizations? [Gomes, Chuck] What about inviting Philip Sheppard (OSC Chair) and/or Ray Fassett (GCOT) chair to our next meeting to discuss this. If we do that, we probably should send them the documents for their review before the meeting so that they understand the context for that meeting. Ken Bour Attachment:
Cover Letter to Section 6 (KBv2-JWv1).doc
|