Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution to Approve Work Prioritization Project List

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Wolf.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/4 <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  I'm ok with the text
>
>
> Regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *Von:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *Im
> Auftrag von *Olga Cavalli
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 3. Mai 2010 17:57
> *An:* Jaime B Wagner
> *Cc:* Gomes, Chuck; Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Betreff:* Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution to Approve Work
> Prioritization Project List
>
> Hi,
> thanks for the text Ken, I agree with it and I can make the motion.
> Chuck, when is the last date for this motion to be submitted to the GNSO?
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/5/3 Jaime B Wagner <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>  Ok Ken, I’m ready to second it as soon as Olga makes the motion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jaime Wagner
>> j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> cel: +55(51)8126-0916
>>
>> dir: +55(51)3219-5955
>>
>>
>>
>> *De:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *Em
>> nome de *Gomes, Chuck
>> *Enviada em:* segunda-feira, 3 de maio de 2010 12:42
>> *Para:* Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> *Assunto:* RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution to Approve
>> Work Prioritization Project List
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Ken.  Looks good to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ken Bour
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 03, 2010 11:36 AM
>> *To:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution to Approve Work
>> Prioritization Project List
>>
>> WPM-DT Members:
>>
>> Below is a draft motion for the upcoming May Council meeting to approve
>> the Work Prioritization Project List.   In this draft, I am assuming that
>> there will be a few changes to the document, which will cause a new version
>> to be created (v1.1).   If it turns out that the Staff’s recommended Project
>> List is accepted by the Council without changes, the motion can be amended
>> as appropriate.   You will also notice that there are a couple of URL links
>> that are not yet available, but I expect to have them shortly once David
>> Olive’s email documents (from 30 April) are published to
>> http://gnso.icann.org.
>>
>> Am I correct in assuming that Olga, as WPM-DT Chair, will make this motion
>> and either Jaime or Wolf will second it?
>>
>> Comments are welcome…
>>
>> Ken
>> ===
>>
>> *DRAFT GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (for 20 May 2010)*
>>
>> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution
>> and timeline<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>to 
>> conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
>> procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and 
>> ANNEX<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf>)
>> recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT);
>>
>> WHEREAS, the first step in the GNSO Work Prioritization timeline called
>> for the ICANN Policy Staff to produce, on or before 30 April 2010, a
>> recommendation of those GNSO projects that should be considered Eligible and
>> Ineligible for the Work Prioritization effort;
>>
>> WHEREAS, the ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO Council
>> a recommended Work Prioritization Project List {Link TBD} document on 30
>> April 2010;
>>
>> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council has reviewed the Staff’s recommended Work
>> Prioritization Project List and its changes and alterations have been
>> incorporated into version 1.1 {Link TBD};
>>
>> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts and approves the GNSO Work
>> Prioritization Project List (version 1.1) for use in all remaining steps of
>> the Work Prioritization timeline that, upon completion, is intended to
>> culminate in a set of approved GNSO project ratings and priorities at the
>> ICANN meeting in Brussels.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>