Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Step 4-Publication of Ratings

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok I agree with your suggestion Ken.
Regards
Olga

2010/6/14 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> WPM-DT Members:
>
>
>
> I started to think about how the final Council Project Value Ratings might
> be published on the GNSO website (Step 4).   Initially, I thought about
> showing the individual Councilor ratings along with the final ones produced
> by the group discussion.   After further consideration, the individual
> Councilor ratings were merely a precursor to facilitating the group
> session.   Although we can certainly make them and that process transparent
> (perhaps as part of a subsequent public comment period), it seems as though
> the final Council ratings resulting from the collaborative group session
> should stand alone.
>
>
>
> I suggest that we post the final Value Ratings in a modified Project List
> document.  See Table 1 of my attached proposal.
>
>
>
> I recommend that we re-sort Table 1 first by Value Rating (high to low),
> then alphabetically by Project Name (for ties).   I would let the column 1
> Sequence Numbers be auto reset (1-15) since they are only there for
> reference.
>
>
>
> Please also note that I added a third table (just before the Glossary) to
> contain the Value definition and the Rating Scale that applies.   I also
> added a footnote to indicate where the procedures can be located that
> explains how these numbers were developed.
>
>
>
> If you concur, we can convert this document to a PDF and place it on the
> GNSO website.   One possible location (pending the new GNSO website) would
> be at the top of the “Issues” (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/) page.   If
> anyone has a better idea for its temporary home, please let me know.
>
>
>
> If all goes well in Brussels on the 19th, this document could be prepared
> in time to share with the Council at its 23 June meeting and, if approved,
> posted to the GNSO website in accordance with the resolution that Olga will
> be making later today.
>
>
>
> I look forward to your thoughts.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>