[gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Step 4-Publication of Ratings
WPM-DT Members: I started to think about how the final Council Project Value Ratings might be published on the GNSO website (Step 4). Initially, I thought about showing the individual Councilor ratings along with the final ones produced by the group discussion. After further consideration, the individual Councilor ratings were merely a precursor to facilitating the group session. Although we can certainly make them and that process transparent (perhaps as part of a subsequent public comment period), it seems as though the final Council ratings resulting from the collaborative group session should stand alone. I suggest that we post the final Value Ratings in a modified Project List document. See Table 1 of my attached proposal. I recommend that we re-sort Table 1 first by Value Rating (high to low), then alphabetically by Project Name (for ties). I would let the column 1 Sequence Numbers be auto reset (1-15) since they are only there for reference. Please also note that I added a third table (just before the Glossary) to contain the Value definition and the Rating Scale that applies. I also added a footnote to indicate where the procedures can be located that explains how these numbers were developed. If you concur, we can convert this document to a PDF and place it on the GNSO website. One possible location (pending the new GNSO website) would be at the top of the "Issues" (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/) page. If anyone has a better idea for its temporary home, please let me know. If all goes well in Brussels on the 19th, this document could be prepared in time to share with the Council at its 23 June meeting and, if approved, posted to the GNSO website in accordance with the resolution that Olga will be making later today. I look forward to your thoughts. Ken Attachment:
GNSO Work Prioritization Project List & Ratings (Council Approved; 23 Jun 2010).doc
|