Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ken,
ok with 14 instead of 15 but the text below says 15...
Am I understanding it right?
regards
Olga

2010/6/20 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> Olga and WPM Team Members:
>
>
>
> I made a modest change to the Council Resolution because we ended up with
> 14 Eligible Projects vs. 15 (at the end of Steps 1 and 2).   If you’ll
> recall, IDNF was transferred from Eligible to Ineligible during the group
> ratings session on 19 June.
>
>
>
> I hope these wording changes are acceptable.
>
>
>
> Note that, according to my recollection, there was no final agreement to
> post these ratings for public comment, but that topic would be discussed by
> the Council at the 23 June session.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
> ===
>
> *GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)
> *
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution
> and timeline<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>to 
> conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
> procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and 
> ANNEX<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf>)
> recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); **
>
> WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first
> three of which have been completed as follows:
>
> 1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
> Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project 
> List<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf>
>  (v1.0),
> including a Cover 
> Letter<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf>,
> on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20 May 
> 2010<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/>
> ]
>
> 2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted
> individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1)
> on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then
> successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3;
>
> 3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
> discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a
> set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note:  the IDNF project was
> determined by the Council to be “Ineligible”);
>
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value
> Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and
> directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according
> to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.
>
>
>