RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We need the maker of the motion to make this change or someone else to
propose an amendment, which I assume will be friendly.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ken Bour
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 11:14 AM
To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

 

Olga and WPM Team Members:

 

I made a modest change to the Council Resolution because we ended up
with 14 Eligible Projects vs. 15 (at the end of Steps 1 and 2).   If
you'll recall, IDNF was transferred from Eligible to Ineligible during
the group ratings session on 19 June.   

 

I hope these wording changes are acceptable.   

 

Note that, according to my recollection, there was no final agreement to
post these ratings for public comment, but that topic would be discussed
by the Council at the 23 June session. 

 

Ken

===

GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a
resolution and timeline
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>  to
conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and ANNEX
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf> )
recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); 

WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the
first three of which have been completed as follows: 

1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project List
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-e
n.pdf>  (v1.0), including a Cover Letter
<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-p
roject-list-30apr10-en.pdf> , on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20
May 2010 <http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> ]

2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total)
submitted individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects
(approved in Step 1) on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7
June), which were then successfully processed and aggregated by Staff
for input to Step 3; 

3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully
finalized a set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note:  the
IDNF project was determined by the Council to be "Ineligible"); 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization
Value Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June
2010 and directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO
website according to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.