RES: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

["Jaime B Wagner" <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I sent it twice (from different accounts) and have not reached the list!!!

Will try from another account.

 

Jaime Wagner
j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

cel: +55(51)8126-0916

dir: +55(51)3219-5955

 

De: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] 
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de junho de 2010 05:36
Para: Jaime B Wagner
Cc: Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

 

ok I have not recieved the message from the GNSO list
regards
Olga

2010/6/21 Jaime B Wagner <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I already sent Olga. Thought it was ok.

 

Jaime Wagner
j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

cel: +55(51)8126-0916

dir: +55(51)3219-5955

 

De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Olga Cavalli
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de junho de 2010 05:17
Para: Jaime B Wagner
Cc: Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

 

Thanks Jaime.
Ken can you draft it? and then I second...
Regards 
Olga

2010/6/21 Jaime B Wagner <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I can make the motion

 

Jaime Wagner
j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

cel: +55(51)8126-0916

dir: +55(51)3219-5955

 

De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Gomes, Chuck
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de junho de 2010 03:31
Para: Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

 

We need the maker of the motion to make this change or someone else to
propose an amendment, which I assume will be friendly.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ken Bour
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 11:14 AM
To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

 

Olga and WPM Team Members:

 

I made a modest change to the Council Resolution because we ended up with 14
Eligible Projects vs. 15 (at the end of Steps 1 and 2).   If you?ll recall,
IDNF was transferred from Eligible to Ineligible during the group ratings
session on 19 June.   

 

I hope these wording changes are acceptable.   

 

Note that, according to my recollection, there was no final agreement to
post these ratings for public comment, but that topic would be discussed by
the Council at the 23 June session. 

 

Ken

===

GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a
resolution and timeline
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>  to conduct
its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of procedures
(proposed Chapter 6 and ANNEX
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf> )
recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); 

WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first
three of which have been completed as follows: 

1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project List
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pd
f>  (v1.0), including a Cover Letter
<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-proje
ct-list-30apr10-en.pdf> , on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on
<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/>  20 May 2010]

2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted
individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1)
on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then
successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3; 

3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a
set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note:  the IDNF project was
determined by the Council to be ?Ineligible?); 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value
Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and
directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according
to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.