RE: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations Summary

["Ray Fassett" <rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Liz, thanks for this document.  While I understand the source document this
came from I think, I am not clear there was "strong support" for this
addition:

2.2 ....and public pre-evaluation hearings.

I personally do not believe this adds to objectives that pertain to
"streamlining", "predictability for the applicant", or "objectivity".

Or perhaps I am just not fully understanding the purpose of this step as it
is intended.  But, my primary point is that I do not recall strong support
for this addition to the document.  Perhaps others recall differently?

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:43 AM
To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations
Summary

Colleagues

Please find attached an updated draft Recommendations Summary which  
includes feedback from a number of participants and from the results  
of the 5 October 2006 conference call.   Thank you very much to those  
who have helped with re-crafting and clarifying language.

Some of the responses I received fell into the category of  
implementation issues which are being discussed, in detail, in a  
series of internal staff calls.

I am happy to take further suggestions and improvements over the next  
few days whilst I complete the drafting of the Final Report.

Note that this is a working draft and has no official status until it  
is included in the draft Final Report.

Kind regards.


Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob