RE: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations Summary
- To: "'Liz Williams'" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations Summary
- From: "Ray Fassett" <rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:00:58 -0400
Liz, thanks for this document. While I understand the source document this
came from I think, I am not clear there was "strong support" for this
2.2 ....and public pre-evaluation hearings.
I personally do not believe this adds to objectives that pertain to
"streamlining", "predictability for the applicant", or "objectivity".
Or perhaps I am just not fully understanding the purpose of this step as it
is intended. But, my primary point is that I do not recall strong support
for this addition to the document. Perhaps others recall differently?
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:43 AM
Subject: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations
Please find attached an updated draft Recommendations Summary which
includes feedback from a number of participants and from the results
of the 5 October 2006 conference call. Thank you very much to those
who have helped with re-crafting and clarifying language.
Some of the responses I received fell into the category of
implementation issues which are being discussed, in detail, in a
series of internal staff calls.
I am happy to take further suggestions and improvements over the next
few days whilst I complete the drafting of the Final Report.
Note that this is a working draft and has no official status until it
is included in the draft Final Report.
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob