RE: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations Summary
- To: "'Liz Williams'" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations Summary
- From: "Ray Fassett" <rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:53:00 -0400
In 2.4, my suggestion is to capitalize the "C" and the "P" as follows (note
that Consensus Policies is capitalized in 4.4):
2.4 Applicants must comply with all ICANN "C"onsensus "P"olicies when
they are developed.
In 2.8, my impression was that strong support existed for "operational" plan
in place of "business" plan as follows:
2.8 The applicant must provide a financial and operational plan that
provides an assurance that the applicant has the capability to meets its
In 4.6, The C & P must be capitalized....same with 4.7
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:43 AM
Subject: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: new TLDsUpdated Recommendations
Please find attached an updated draft Recommendations Summary which
includes feedback from a number of participants and from the results
of the 5 October 2006 conference call. Thank you very much to those
who have helped with re-crafting and clarifying language.
Some of the responses I received fell into the category of
implementation issues which are being discussed, in detail, in a
series of internal staff calls.
I am happy to take further suggestions and improvements over the next
few days whilst I complete the drafting of the Final Report.
Note that this is a working draft and has no official status until it
is included in the draft Final Report.
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob