<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gtld-council] PDP05 - renewals
- To: <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gtld-council] PDP05 - renewals
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:16:44 +1000
Hello Philip,
> I wonder if we need to have clearer wording on the question
> of renewals?
> I recall our target was to not have presumptive renewal but
> some expectancy for a good performer and also to allow for
> re-bids at the time of renewal.
It was not my re-collection that there would be a re-bid process. I
don't see that as a renewal expectancy. That is a re-bid process where
consideration of past performance would be taken into account.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|