RE: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robin,

Is this the Impact Statement that Liz had requested from each of the
constituencies?

I confess that I have not had time to read the entire document, but at
first glance it looks more like an opinion statement than an impact
statement.  Certainly, the opinions of the NCUC are important and should
be considered in the final deliberations of the Council on the report
that will be sent to the Board, but unless I am misunderstanding
something, the purpose of impact statements is different:  Annex A of
the ICANN Bylaws, Section 11.c, says that the Final Report to the Board
must include "An analysis of how the issue would affect each
constituency, including any financial impact on the constituency".  I
presume that Liz needs the impact statements so that she can perform
that analysis for the Council.  Liz - please correct me if I am wrong on
this.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:56 PM
> To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Milton Mueller; Liz Williams
> Subject: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations 
> 
> NCUC Statement on PDP-Dec05:
> 
>   
> http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
T-JUNE2007.htm
>        or
>  
> http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
T-JUNE2007.pdf 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
>