Re: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations

[Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck,

Yes, this is NCUC's impact statement on how the recommendations will 
affect our members. 

Since we are the 'non-commercial' constituency, it would make little 
sense for us to restrict our comments to only financial impacts on our 
constituency.
Thanks,
Robin


Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Robin,
>
> Is this the Impact Statement that Liz had requested from each of the
> constituencies?
>
> I confess that I have not had time to read the entire document, but at
> first glance it looks more like an opinion statement than an impact
> statement.  Certainly, the opinions of the NCUC are important and should
> be considered in the final deliberations of the Council on the report
> that will be sent to the Board, but unless I am misunderstanding
> something, the purpose of impact statements is different:  Annex A of
> the ICANN Bylaws, Section 11.c, says that the Final Report to the Board
> must include "An analysis of how the issue would affect each
> constituency, including any financial impact on the constituency".  I
> presume that Liz needs the impact statements so that she can perform
> that analysis for the Council.  Liz - please correct me if I am wrong on
> this.
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>
>  
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:56 PM
> > To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Milton Mueller; Liz Williams
> > Subject: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations 
> >
> > NCUC Statement on PDP-Dec05:
> >
> >  
> > http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
> >    
> T-JUNE2007.htm
>  
>
> >       or
> >
> > http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
> >    
> T-JUNE2007.pdf 
>  
>
> > Thanks,
> > Robin
> >
> >    
>