RE: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Robin.  I in no way meant to imply that only financial impacts
should be considered.  The RyC Impact Statement included financial and
non-financial impacts and I believe that the statement in the Bylaws
asks for both.

How many non-commercial organizations were involved in the development
of the impact statement?

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Gross [mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:30 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Milton Mueller; Liz Williams
> Subject: Re: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy 
> recommendations
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> Yes, this is NCUC's impact statement on how the 
> recommendations will affect our members. 
> 
> Since we are the 'non-commercial' constituency, it would make 
> little sense for us to restrict our comments to only 
> financial impacts on our constituency.
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> 
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> >Robin,
> >
> >Is this the Impact Statement that Liz had requested from each of the 
> >constituencies?
> >
> >I confess that I have not had time to read the entire 
> document, but at 
> >first glance it looks more like an opinion statement than an impact 
> >statement.  Certainly, the opinions of the NCUC are important and 
> >should be considered in the final deliberations of the 
> Council on the 
> >report that will be sent to the Board, but unless I am 
> misunderstanding 
> >something, the purpose of impact statements is different:  
> Annex A of 
> >the ICANN Bylaws, Section 11.c, says that the Final Report 
> to the Board 
> >must include "An analysis of how the issue would affect each 
> >constituency, including any financial impact on the 
> constituency".  I 
> >presume that Liz needs the impact statements so that she can perform 
> >that analysis for the Council.  Liz - please correct me if I 
> am wrong 
> >on this.
> >
> >Chuck Gomes
> > 
> >"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
> >which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
> privileged, 
> >confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 
> >unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly 
> prohibited. 
> >If you have received this message in error, please notify sender 
> >immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> > 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >>[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
> >>Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:56 PM
> >>To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Cc: Milton Mueller; Liz Williams
> >>Subject: [gtld-council] NCUC stmt on new gtld policy recommendations
> >>
> >>NCUC Statement on PDP-Dec05:
> >>
> >>  
> >>http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
> >>    
> >>
> >T-JUNE2007.htm
> >  
> >
> >>       or
> >> 
> >>http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/drafts/PDP-Dec05-NCUC-CONST-STM
> >>    
> >>
> >T-JUNE2007.pdf
> >  
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Robin
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> 
>