Re: [gtld-council] Objection criteria

[Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>]

Colleagues

I wonder if you could re-visit this question within your various  
working groups -- the nature of objection and the standing of  
objectors in the application evaluation process is important.
This thread was not completed post Lisbon and I would value further  
discussion if you can.
Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 26 Mar 2007, at 16:50, Avri Doria wrote:

> hi,
>
> I agree that a lot of the basis is in there, and Liz is right it  
> will be specific by string category.  but I think the process  
> involves diving into the details more then we have to date and  
> proposing specific criteria and thresholds.
> Maybe RN is the right place to do this and this should be part of  
> its next scope  of work - i did not mean to argue that it could not  
> be done there, and it is an extension of the RN work.  I just think  
> that someone needs to focus some extra intense cycles on this  
> specific task.
> a.
>
>
> On 26 mar 2007, at 15.38, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > I think that the RN-WG Controversial names report may be helpful  
> > in this
> > regard.  Some excellent thought was provided in the report that  
> > could be
> > beneficial to the dispute process in the overall process.
> >
> > Chuck Gomes
> >
> > "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed, and may contain information that is  
> > privileged,
> > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> > unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly  
> > prohibited. If
> > you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> > immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:29 AM
> > > To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [gtld-council] Objection criteria
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As the questions in the open forum provoke - i think this is
> > > an area where we are still wildly hand waving.
> > >
> > > Perhaps this is worth  small WG/editing team effort to create
> > > some proposed language for establishing guideline on who has
> > > standing, how the objection is judged valid, how the question
> > > is passed off to the review team etc...
> > >
> > > a.