<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June
- To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June
- From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
--- Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My point is slightly different I think. Unless a court of
> competent
> jurisdiction determines that I have broken the law, then I
> have not
> broken the law. Anyone claiming any different is simply making
> an
> allegation. Allegations are cheap, and should not be part of a
> process
> that demands certainty for applicants and the community.
I have to admit that this is a serious issue and question - in
every sense possible. If anything, we are faced with the
challenge of coming up with a legitimate and stable way of
making such determination.
Mawaki
> --
> Regards,
>
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> Tucows Inc.
>
> http://www.domaindirect.com
> t. 416.538.5492
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|