[gtld-council] modifications to new gTLD recommendations #3 and 6

["Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>]

As there seems to be a logical difference between a string infringing a third 
party right
and a process infringing freedom of expression, is not the solution to make two 
beautifully
worded recommendations, rather than one ugly hodge-podge we currently have ?

So recomm 3 reads:
Strings must not infringe the existing legal rights of others that are 
recognized or
enforceable under generally accepted and internationally recognized principles 
of law.
Examples of such legal rights include, but are not limited to, the rights 
defined in the
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and in particular 
trade-mark
rights.

And over to Robin for a whole new recomm 21 about the "process" and "freedom of 
expression".


Philip