ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gtld-council] modifications to new gTLD recommendations #3 and 6

  • To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gtld-council] modifications to new gTLD recommendations #3 and 6
  • From: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:40:28 -0700

Thanks, Philip. Personally, I would be happy with this approach. So if there are no objections from others to it, I'll draft a stmt for #21 and send it to the list tonight for comment.


Philip Sheppard wrote:

As there seems to be a logical difference between a string infringing a third 
party right
and a process infringing freedom of expression, is not the solution to make two 
worded recommendations, rather than one ugly hodge-podge we currently have ?

So recomm 3 reads:
Strings must not infringe the existing legal rights of others that are 
recognized or
enforceable under generally accepted and internationally recognized principles 
of law.
Examples of such legal rights include, but are not limited to, the rights 
defined in the
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and in particular 

And over to Robin for a whole new recomm 21 about the "process" and "freedom of 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy