Re: [gtld-council] proposed new Rec. #21

[Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Bruce.

Yes, I like the phrasing you suggest and also putting this as a 
principle (but I'd be fine with it as a recommendation also if others 
disagree).
Thank you for this innovative suggestion.

Best,
Robin


Bruce Tonkin wrote:

> Hello Robin,
>
>
>  
>
> > How about the following for a proposed new Rec #21?
> >
> > "The string evaluation process must not infringe the 
> > applicant's freedom 
> > of expression rights that are enforceable under internationally 
> > recognized principles of law."
> >    
>
> This may be better as a principle.   Just as we have principles about
> making the process objective etc.
>
> You might also want to word it as:
>
> "The string evaluation process must not infringe the applicant's freedom
> of expression rights that are protected under internationally recognized
> principles of law."
>
> Ie substitute the word "protected" for the word "enforceable".
>
> Regards,
> Bruce
>
>