RE: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20 - New Wording Proposal
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20 - New Wording Proposal
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:38:22 -0400
Excellent work Philip. Very constructive.
I am pressed for time right now because of multiple meetings but I will
respond more later. As you can see from my response to Mawaki's
message, I think there were a couple key things that you left out. But
overall, I like what you did.
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:34 AM
Subject: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20 - New Wording Proposal
I like Chuck's new approach very much and support the objective.
On re-reading all our efforts I see we are all confusing:
- an objective
- a process
- guidelines / definitions.
Taking Chuck's lead I attach a new proposal which separates out
Does this work for everyone ?