RE: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20 - New Wording Proposal
I finally found some time to respond in more detail to Philip's new
wording; my comments are highlighted in the attached file. Note that
the file also includes changes recommended by those on the Rec.20 call
that occurred earlier today. Hopefully this will faciliate our
discussion in the full committee call tomorrow. Please feel free to
comment in the meantime.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
________________________________
From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:34 AM
To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20 - New Wording Proposal
I like Chuck's new approach very much and support the objective.
On re-reading all our efforts I see we are all confusing:
- an objective
- a process
- guidelines / definitions.
Taking Chuck's lead I attach a new proposal which separates out
these three.
Does this work for everyone ?
Philip
-----------------
Attachment:
Rec 20 Wording v45 (2) with Gomes comments.doc
|