ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gtld-council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20

  • To: <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gtld-council] Recommendation 20
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:43:12 +1000

Hello All,

> 
> Avri, yes good clarification. We did all intend there to be a 
> panel as there is for other
> objections.


Is there an intent to take a dispute resolution approach or a yes/no
approach?

Ie Once an objector is determined to have standing and to have a
legitimate complaint, would the approach be to encourage the applicant
and the objector to attempt to reach a resolution (as used by ICANN when
there may be a compliant about an applicant for a cctld string in the
ISO table), or is the approach more like the decisions around a string
being confusingly similar where the result is a yes/no decision made by
the panel?

Thanks,
Bruce




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy