[gtld-council] Updated recommendation table - new IGP (h)
- To: <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gtld-council] Updated recommendation table - new IGP (h)
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:35:57 +0200
I have a question about "verifiable" in this context.
Verifiable is typically a criterion when you need to prove something that is
Papers may exist, title deeds, etc.
In our case we are looking at:
- a string that may have no indication of use.
- a future event.
- possible detriment as a result of that speculated future.
On this basis "verifiable" may be a hurdle too far.
Image the case of a cultural community with a unique name.
For them there is but one name.
For the string propose who may think the name sounds fashionable, there are
How does the cultural community provide "verifiable" evidence ?
Are we to insist they pay a consultant $50,000 for a survey ?
"Verifiable" does not have the right feel to me in this context.
Comments from others?