RE: [gtld-council] agenda for new gtld mtg - monday aug 6 - proposed

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Very constructive suggestions Kristina.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:13 AM
> To: liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx; avri@xxxxxxx
> Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gtld-council] agenda for new gtld mtg - monday 
> aug 6 - proposed
> 
> I can't be on the call.  I agree with Chuck's edits and have 
> the following suggested edits.
> 
> Table headings should be repeated where the table covers more 
> than one page.
> 
> P(age). 26:  Source of diagram (or data for it if 
> staff-created) needs to be identified.  Connection between 
> traffic and name space demand should be elaborated upon - 
> assumption won't be clear to all.
> 
> P 30:  text of (iv) should be integrated into (v) or a footnote to it.
> 
> P 32, n46:  Sha'ban (lower case)
> 
> P 34, (ix):  Quoted language pertains to registration, which 
> is not a requirement for trademark protection under US law, 
> so section should be clarified.  Easiest fix is to replace 
> "states" with "requires applicants for trademark registration 
> to state under penalty of perjury". 
> 
> P 38, n 53:  Sheppard
> 
> P 39, line 2: insert "to address" between "place" and "conflicts"
> 
> Finally, the report does not contain any explanation for the 
> inclusion in Part A of the full text of NCUC minority 
> statements and Avri's statements while relegating remaining 
> Constituency Statements to Part B and, even if it did, such 
> an explanation  statement does not seem likely to  me to 
> avoid potentially (and inadvertently) misleading readers not 
> as engrossed in the process as we have been.  First, any 
> reasons for highlighting these statements may be lost or 
> blurred as readers get further into the report.  Second, the 
> footnotes of NCUC full text use entire pages (58, 76-79) and 
> readers may not recall that they are reading minority statements. 
> 
> It seems preferable to me that
> the full text of these statrements be in Part B with 
> footnotes in Part A that state the existence of concerns or 
> minority report on a particular point and specific page 
> references to their location in Part B.  Another alternative, 
> which I do not prefer ( because I do not believe it would be 
> equally effective), is to include a very clear explanation as 
> to why these statements are in Part A - and not Part B - and 
> textual "markers" on the pages consisting of or containing 
> primarily minority statements or other concerns. 
> 
> Kristina
> 
> Kristina Rosette
> Covington & Burling LLP
> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
> Washington, DC  20004-2401
> voice:  202-662-5173
> direct fax:  202-778-5173
> main fax:  202-662-6291
> e-mail:  krosette@xxxxxxx
> 
> This message is from a law firm and may contain information 
> that is confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not 
> the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender 
> by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently 
> transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system.  
> Thank you for your cooperation.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------
> Sent from my Wireless Handheld
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon Aug 06 06:10:18 2007
> Subject: Re: [gtld-council] agenda for new gtld mtg - monday 
> aug 6 - proposed
> 
> Many thanks.  I'll wait until the end of today's meeting and 
> make adjustments as necessary.
> 
> Liz
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 06 Aug 2007, at 12:04, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> > hi,
> >
> > Sorry it took me until today, but last week was booked solid.  In 
> > reading it through, i find i agree with Chuck's edits and 
> have little 
> > to add other then what i sent you privately about the 
> hebrew rn entry 
> > and table problems.
> >
> > A question i have is whether recommendation 20 really 
> belongs with ToR 
> > 4 on contractual conditions" and not with ToR 3 on 
> allocation methods?
> >
> > a.
> >
> > On 6 aug 2007, at 11.26, Liz Williams wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Avri
> >>
> >> Just a quick note for everyone before the meeting.  I haven't  
> >> received any other edits other than those from Chuck.  If 
> you have  
> >> sent me something then please send again and I'll be sure 
> to check  
> >> the junk filter.
> >>
> >> Kind regards.
> >>
> >> Liz
> >> .....................................................
> >>
> >> Liz Williams
> >> Senior Policy Counselor
> >> ICANN - Brussels
> >> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> >> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> >> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04 Aug 2007, at 23:57, Avri Doria wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The following is the proposed agenda for out next meeting.   
> >>> Please send any comments or agenda items to the list.
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>> a.
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> - starting  (10 min)
> >>>   - roll call
> >>>   - interest statements
> >>>   - agenda
> >>>
> >>> - open discussion on draft of 30 July (60 min)
> >>>   - preparatory to scheduling for council discussion and vote
> >>>
> >>> - review of action item list (20 min)
> >>>
> >>> - any other business (20 min)
> >>>
> >>> - is the new gtld committee adjourned? (10 min)
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> 
>