Re: [gtld-council] agenda for new gtld mtg - monday aug 6 - proposed

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

i would personally be comfortable with seeing a specific cross  
reference to the location in B for my comments.  i can, however,  
understand why someone might want to have their comments inline, or  
at least a local footnote.  perhaps if they were done as end notes -  
in the same document but in the back.
a.

On 6 aug 2007, at 15.13, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

> It seems preferable to me that
> the full text of these statrements be in Part B with footnotes in  
> Part A that state the existence of concerns or minority report on a  
> particular point and specific page references to their location in  
> Part B.  Another alternative, which I do not prefer ( because I do  
> not believe it would be equally effective), is to include a very  
> clear explanation as to why these statements are in Part A - and  
> not Part B - and textual "markers" on the pages consisting of or  
> containing primarily minority statements or other concerns.