ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gtld-guide]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Question re Module 3, Sec. 3.4

  • To: <gtld-guide@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Question re Module 3, Sec. 3.4
  • From: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:50:48 -0600

Will applicants whose strings are in contention and subject to determination by a single panelist have an opportunity for legal review comparable to the UDRP provision: "The mandatory administrative proceeding requirements set forth in <file:///../../../../Local%20Settings/Temp/eud70.htm#4>Paragraph 4 shall not prevent either you or the complainant from submitting the dispute to a court of competent jurisdiction for independent resolution before such mandatory administrative proceeding is commenced or after such proceeding is concluded. "
(Section 4(k) of the UDRP)
and if not, why not?
Thank you.
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President - Law & Policy
.ORG, The Public Interest Registry
1775 Wiehle Ave, #201
Reston, VA 20190  USA
(v) +1-312-876-8055
(f)  +1-312-876-7934
http://www.pir.org

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>