Module 3, section 3.2

[Eric Brunner-Williams <eric.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

How does the "legal right" DRP substantively differ from the "community 
objections" DRP?
Commentary. The proposed process for the "legal right" DRP appears to 
have a proposed cost two orders of magnitude less than the proposed cost 
for the proposed process for "community objections" DRP. The choice of 
proposed vendors may explain a difference in pricing, but if the 
underlying process is not two orders of magnitude different in 
complexity, than the difference in cost has no justification other than 
the vendor choice.
If th "legal right" DRP involves forming judgements on questions of 
"substantal" (opposition) and "likelihood" (detriment), how is two 
orders of magnitude of cost difference commercially reasonable for the 
cost of forming similar judgements for "community objections"?
Eric Brunner-Williams
CTO, CORE