<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Review of proposals for completness
- To: "Icg-Forum@Icann. Org" <icg-forum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Review of proposals for completness
- From: "Richard Hill" <rhill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:37:27 +0100
I refer to:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/2015-February/002888.html
In the attach Individual Process and Proposal Assessemnt Sheet, Patrik
Faltstrom states, under B.2, with respect to the the numbers proposal:
"There have been no comments which indicate that further clarification or
explanation of the proposal is required."
This is not correct, since I have stated that the numbers proposal is
incomplete and requires clarification with respect to certain details
(dispute resolution clause and jurisdiction clause).
Best,
Richard
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|