Additional Comments by Paul Keating

["Paul Keating \(LAW.es\)" <paul@xxxxxx>]

The current URS does not preclude a complainant from filing a complaint as
against a domain name that clearly pre-dated the asserted trademark
registration.  Given the clear-cut abuse purpose of the URS, I cannot
imagine an instance in which a post-domain-name-registered trademark could
meet the suggested standard.
 
Sincerely,
 
Paul Raynor Keating, Esq.
Tel. +34 93 368 0247
Fax. (Europe) +34 93 396 0810
Fax. (US)(415) 358.4450 
Skype: Prk-Spain
email:  PRKeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxx &  <blocked::mailto:Paul@xxxxxx> Paul@xxxxxx

 

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY CONTAIN
INFORMATION SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY/CLIENT OR WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGE.  THE
INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHOM
IT IS ADDRESSED.  IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE
HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF
THIS COMMUNICATION AND/OR ITS ATTACHMENT(S) IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Circular 230 Disclosure: To assure compliance with Treasury Department rules
governing tax practice, we hereby inform you that any advice contained
herein (including in any attachment) (1) was not written or intended to be
used, and cannot be used, by you or any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding
any penalties that may be imposed on you or any taxpayer and (2) may not be
used or referred to by you or any other person in connection with promoting,
marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter
addressed herein.

NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS EMAIL SHALL CONSTITUTE THE FORMATION OF AN
ATTORNEY/CLIENT RELATIONSHIP; SUCH A RELATIONSHIP MAY BE FORMED WITH THIS
FIRM AND ATTORNEY ONLY BY SEPARATE FORMAL WRITTEN ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT,
WHICH THIS IS NOT.  IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH AN AGREEMENT, NOTHING CONTAINED
HEREIN SHALL CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE.