RE: [jig] FW: [council] Fwd: JIG letter

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the note Fahd,

Will relay the note to Lesley and Stéphane.

Edmon

 

 

 

 

From: owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fahd A. 
Batayneh
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:26 PM
To: Edmon Chung
Cc: jig
Subject: Re: [jig] FW: [council] Fwd: JIG letter

 

Thank you Edmon. In the document entitled "Draft Joint ccNSO/gNSO to Board 
Single Character IDN TLD", the first paragraph after "Dear Steve" states "In 
December 2012 ...". I believe 2012 should be replaced with 2011.

I am fine with the rest of the document.

Cheers,

-- FAB
Sent from Beirut, Lebanon

 

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

FYI on the progress regarding response on Single Character IDN TLD.

Edmon

 

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 6:43 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Fwd: JIG letter

 

Councillors,

 

Please find attached a message from the ccNSO Chair.

 

I am putting this item on our next agenda and will be seeking from the Council 
direction on how to act. Do we want to approve the sending of a joint Council 
letter, or do we prefer to let the ccNSO send it's own letter?

 

Failing any decision or direction from the Council on this at our next 
teleconference, I will report to the ccNSO that there is no agreement from the 
GNSO on sending the joint letter.

 

Thanks,

 

Stéphane

 

 

 

Début du message réexpédié :

 

De : Lesley Cowley <lesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Objet : JIG letter

Date : 27 janvier 2012 20:49:20 HNEC

À : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>

Cc : Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>, Gabriella Schittek 
<gabriella.schittek@xxxxxxxxx>, Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'Jian Zhang' 
<jian@xxxxxxxxx>

 

Hi Stephane,

 

As I advised previously, the ccNSO Council did not adopt the draft letter as 
proposed by the joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN WG (JIG). However, the ccNSO Council did 
decide to re-iterate its support for the introduction of Single Character IDN 
TLD’s and wanted to understand the current status of the implementation of the 
Board decision.  


Attached is the proposed letter from the ccNSO to the Board (Draft ccNSO to 
Board Single Character IDN TLD), which has been shared by email with the 
Council, but has not yet been formally adopted. Also attached is a draft joint 
letter for discussion with the GNSO  (Draft joint ccNSO-GNSO to Board).  

As the JIG is a joint WG, the ccNSO Council believes that a joint letter from 
the Councils remains the preferred option, and we would appreciate the views of 
the GNSO Council on this matter and whether the GNSO is willing to support the 
proposed letter.   

The ccNSO Council will adopt either the ccNSO or joint ccNSO & GNSO letter, as 
soon as possible, depending on the position of the GNSO Council.

Kind regards,

 

Lesley

ccNSO Chair