Re: [jig] Friendly reminder: comments from WG members on Draft Summary and Analysis public comments Universal Acceptnace
- To: jig <jig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [jig] Friendly reminder: comments from WG members on Draft Summary and Analysis public comments Universal Acceptnace
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 07:42:00 -0400
On 1 May 2012, at 10:04, Bart Boswinkel wrote:
> Dear all,
> Friendly reminder: To date I have received comments from Fahd. If you have
> any commen,t please sent them to the list over the next week. I will then
> consolidate them in the next version of the document which will be send to
> the group for discussion and adoption. The Summary and Analysis will have to
> be posted to close the public comment forum for the Initial Report on
> Universal Acceptance.
> Thanks you and kind regards,
> <Draft summary and analysis of comments JIG Interim Universal Acceptance.doc>
Apologies for the late review.
In addition to some typo issues that I noted in a copy of the doc I am sending
to Bart, I do have one issue.
At the same time, the RySG cautioned against the possible time it may take to
just answering all the questions raised ( and implicitly, the resources needed
to resolve the issues) to ensure universal acceptance of IDN TLD’s.[
This must have been discussed at a meeting I skipped. Apologies for that.
I understood the RySG comment to be asking for clarification on the rseponse we
really wanted from them. And an inidication that it may take a lot of time for
them to provide the answers we might have been asking for.
They ask for clarification.
After reviewing the report, the RySG is not clear regarding the extent of input
Did we do that? Again, I have been distracted, missed a few meetings (without
catching up on the recordings - mea culpa ...) and don't recall.