Re: [jig] Friendly reminder: comments from WG members on Draft Summary and Analysis public comments Universal Acceptnace

[Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all,
Included an updated version of the summary and analysis document (clean and
redline).

With regard to the specific issue raised by Avri:
The topic has not been discussed by the JIG. In order to move forward I have
included as suggested language that the JIG will provide clarification in
its next report on IDN TLD's.

Please note also in this context that according to the FY2013 draft plan and
budget one of the proposed projects relates to Universal Acceptance of TLD's
( see page 59, for a brief description), the leader of this ICANN project is
already engaged with the JIG.

If the members of the JIG approve the final version, I will post it and the
public forum can be formally closed.


Kind regards,
Bart
  
 


On 5/8/12 1:42 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 1 May 2012, at 10:04, Bart Boswinkel wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> Friendly reminder: To date I have received comments from Fahd. If you have
>> any commen,t please sent them to the list over the next week. I will then
>> consolidate them in the next version of the document which will be send to
>> the group for discussion and adoption. The Summary and Analysis will have to
>> be posted to close the public comment forum for the Initial Report on
>> Universal Acceptance.
>> Thanks you and kind regards,
>> Bart
>> <Draft summary and analysis of comments JIG Interim Universal Acceptance.doc>
> 
> 
> Apologies for the late review.
> 
> In addition to some typo issues that I noted in a copy of the doc I am sending
> to Bart, I do have one issue.
> 
> "
> At the same time, the RySG cautioned against the possible time it may take to
> just answering all the questions raised ( and implicitly, the resources needed
> to resolve the issues) to ensure universal acceptance of IDN TLD¹s.[
> "
> 
> This must have been discussed at a meeting I skipped. Apologies for that.
> 
> I understood the RySG comment to be asking for clarification on the rseponse
> we really wanted from them.  And an inidication that it may take a lot of time
> for them to provide the answers we might have been asking for.
> 
> They ask for clarification.
> 
> "
> After reviewing the report, the RySG is not clear regarding the extent of
> input being solicited.
> "
> 
> Did we do that?  Again, I have been distracted, missed a few meetings (without
> catching up on the recordings - mea culpa ...) and don't recall.
> 
> thanks
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
>

Attachment: binxbCRiPbDrq.bin
Description: application/applefile

Attachment: Draft summary and an#560468.doc
Description: Draft summary and analysis of comments JIG Interim Universal Acceptance version2.doc

Attachment: Draft summary and analysis of comments JIG Interim Universal Acceptance v 2 clean.doc
Description: Draft summary and analysis of comments JIG Interim Universal Acceptance v 2 clean.doc