Re: [jig] Friendly reminder: comments from WG members on Draft Summary and Analysis public comments Universal Acceptnace

["Fahd A. Batayneh" <fahd.batayneh@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Bart, I am fine with the final version.

Cheers,

-- FAB

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Bart Boswinkel
<bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Dear all,
> Included an updated version of the summary and analysis document (clean and
> redline).
>
> With regard to the specific issue raised by Avri:
> The topic has not been discussed by the JIG. In order to move forward I
> have
> included as suggested language that the JIG will provide clarification in
> its next report on IDN TLD's.
>
> Please note also in this context that according to the FY2013 draft plan
> and
> budget one of the proposed projects relates to Universal Acceptance of
> TLD's
> ( see page 59, for a brief description), the leader of this ICANN project
> is
> already engaged with the JIG.
>
> If the members of the JIG approve the final version, I will post it and the
> public forum can be formally closed.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Bart
>
>
>
>
> On 5/8/12 1:42 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 1 May 2012, at 10:04, Bart Boswinkel wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >> Friendly reminder: To date I have received comments from Fahd. If you
> have
> >> any commen,t please sent them to the list over the next week. I will
> then
> >> consolidate them in the next version of the document which will be send
> to
> >> the group for discussion and adoption. The Summary and Analysis will
> have to
> >> be posted to close the public comment forum for the Initial Report on
> >> Universal Acceptance.
> >> Thanks you and kind regards,
> >> Bart
> >> <Draft summary and analysis of comments JIG Interim Universal
> Acceptance.doc>
> >
> >
> > Apologies for the late review.
> >
> > In addition to some typo issues that I noted in a copy of the doc I am
> sending
> > to Bart, I do have one issue.
> >
> > "
> > At the same time, the RySG cautioned against the possible time it may
> take to
> > just answering all the questions raised ( and implicitly, the resources
> needed
> > to resolve the issues) to ensure universal acceptance of IDN TLD¹s.[
> > "
> >
> > This must have been discussed at a meeting I skipped. Apologies for that.
> >
> > I understood the RySG comment to be asking for clarification on the
> rseponse
> > we really wanted from them.  And an inidication that it may take a lot
> of time
> > for them to provide the answers we might have been asking for.
> >
> > They ask for clarification.
> >
> > "
> > After reviewing the report, the RySG is not clear regarding the extent of
> > input being solicited.
> > "
> >
> > Did we do that?  Again, I have been distracted, missed a few meetings
> (without
> > catching up on the recordings - mea culpa ...) and don't recall.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>