Re: [jig] thoughts on adjustments going forward

["Fahd A. Batayneh" <fahd.batayneh@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Edmon for sharing your thoughts.

While my contribution to the JIG-WG has been blacked-out due to other
commitments, I agree to your suggestions. Since the JIG-WG has a diverse
set of expertise from the IDN community, if another WG is formulated to go
in parallel with the VIP work, then most of the participants on that
working group shall be members of the JIG-WG. Re-mandating the JIG-WG is
the way forward.

Fahd

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Right after the Prague meeting, Jian and I had a brief discussion about
> the configuration of the JIG going forward.
> As the VIP continues its work and as the staff team on Universal
> Acceptance gears up, perhaps the best way for the JIG to operate would be
> for it to assist alongside the two initiatives.
>
> Therefore, instead of a group for the initiation and development of
> recommendations, perhaps we should reconfigure the JIG into a standing
> group to observe and support the staff initiatives on the issues of common
> interest (between ccNSO and GNSO) on IDN TLDs going forward.  This would
> allow us to maintain a consistent role to look into issues with policy
> impact or implications from the board/staff team efforts on IDN TLDs, to
> provide our input into those teams to support implementation, and for us to
> report back to our respective councils for their further actions when
> needed.
>
> Will make this one of the topics for our discussion in our next conference
> call.  Please feel free of course to discuss over this list as well.
>
> Also, with that and also according to our previous plans, we will move
> away from bi-weekly calls to monthly calls, and the proposed meeting days
> are:
> 7 August,
> 4 September
> 2 October
>
> Leading up to the Toronto meeting.
>
> Let us know if there are any concerns/thoughts/ideas.
>
> Edmon
>
>
>
>
>
>