<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
save our communications
- To: net-agreement-renewal@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: save our communications
- From: Sam Smith <42margaret@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:14:45 -0700
Please, please allow us to continue the present .net spaces.
The corporations who are pushing the agenda of total control are
anti-innovation in that anything they do not control by copyright is to
be deemed illegal.
I have the right of free communication and sharing what I create with
whoever I wish. If I create a picture or write an article, I have the
right to use it as I wish.
"Site operators accused of copyright infringement should be sued in the
appropriate courts, which can issue injunctions during or after the
proceeding, on the basis of evidence. It is not appropriate to ask
Verisign to adjudicate technically complex copyright claims. The outcome
will be similar to what we've seen already: overreaching claims,
seizures of legitimate sites, and a shoot-first, ask-questions-later
approach characteristic of the IPC's members."
2. PRIVATE DOMAIN REGISTRATION IS A FEATURE, NOT A BUG
Unlike Happy Mutants or the IPC, many domain registrants are private
individuals, lacking a commercial office, PO box or other address for
use in domain registration. Compelling registrars to publish their
customers' home addresses on the public Internet isn't a "best practice"
-- it's a privacy disaster in the making, a gift to identity thieves and
stalkers, and anything but common sense. We don't publish our home
addresses on the Internet, and neither do the people who pay the bills
at the IPC. Why should everyone else be required to, just to save the
IPC's members the trouble of securing a court order when they believe
their rights are being infringed?"
This is ANTI-SMALL BUSINESS at it's worst.
Thank you, Susan Lehrer
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|