.NET Agreement Renewal Comment

[Eli <eli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

To whom it may concern:

I am the co-owner of NinjaPhoto.net, owned by Peacekeeper Enterprises, 
LLC, on whose behalf I write today. I am writing to express Peacekeeper 
Enterprises' objections to the comments filed by the Intellectual 
Property Constituency, available here:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf

Site operators accused of copyright infringement should be sued in the 
appropriate courts, which can issue injunctions during or after the 
proceeding, on the basis of evidence. It is not appropriate to ask 
Dotster to adjudicate technically complex copyright claims. The outcome 
will be similar to what we've seen already: overreaching claims, 
seizures of legitimate sites, and a shoot-first, ask-questions-later 
approach characteristic of the IPC's members.
Many domain registrants are private individuals lacking an alternative 
address from their home address for use in domain registration. 
Compelling registrars to publish their customers' home addresses is a 
privacy disaster in the making. Why should everyone else be required to 
subsidize the cost of IPC's members legal fees by not requiring them to 
get a proper court order? The IPC's attack on the privacy rights for 
.NET domains is just a stepping stone to attacking the rights of .COM 
domain holders.
For these reasons, we ask that you disregard the comments of the IPC in 
their entirety.
Thank you,
Eli Mapstead
Peacekeeper Enterprises, LLC.
2600 L Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301