Re: [ga] Auctions
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN new-gtlds <new-gtlds-pdp-comments@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Auctions
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:04:38 -0800
Danny, Karl and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
I do wholly agree with Richard Sheapards arguments regarding the
auction model for determining what TLD's are introduced and whom
would be the registry of same. Yet as I have for our members many
times expressed in varying and no uncertain terms, the auction model
is anti competitive and not a free market approach which in our
collective majority opinion's is bad for a growing and thriving
Danny Younger wrote:
> Re: "Even during my term there were those who were
> absolutely, totally, and utterly against auctions, and
> some of those are still on the board."
> While we have heard the arguments in favor of auctions
> (Manheim, Solum, Mueller, yourself, etc.), we have
> frankly not yet considered the opposing points of
> view... in part because those privately-held views
> haven't been made public.
> For the sake of parity, I am therefore posting the
> Cross-Constituency view (BC-IPC-ISPCP) that opposes
> auctions (you may note that I don't agree with their
> position but I am posting it for the sake of
> discussion). This is an excerpt from Philip
> Sheppard's White Paper on internet domain name
> expansion (June 2005):
> "5. The problem with an auction model for new domain
> Sell to the highest bidder and hope that they have it
> ICANN has indicated it may experiment with an auction
> model for the allocation of new domain names. This
> follows a suggestion aired though not justified in a
> 2004 paper from the OECD telecoms working party
> (bibliography reference 14). The paper compared an
> auction model to the laissez-faire model but
> regrettably did not address the quality benefits
> inherent in the added-value sponsored gTLD model.
> On the surface an auction model is more desirable than
> a 100% laissez-faire approach as the market would
> decide by price on the viability of success. But the
> approach has several drawbacks:
> ?X Not so market-driven. An auction model may rely on
> a third party to dream up the names to auction. Who
> will that be? ICANN? Who says these will be the right
> ?X Introduces bias. A work-around would be to allow
> the names to be proposed by the first prospective
> registry and then allow others to bid. But in such a
> case the latter bidders would always be at a
> disadvantage with respect to preparedness and their
> ability to assess the upper limit on a viable auction
> ?X Still no added value. Without the principles of
> differentiation, certainty and good faith, an auction
> model has no inherent ability to add value in the
> public interest.
> ?X Market distortion from market hype. As the global
> bids for third generation mobile telephony have shown,
> even experienced companies may be tempted to grossly
> overbid in an auction model. The Internet has had its
> share of hype and will continue to do so. The prospect
> of the ¡§winner¡¦s curse¡¨ is real.
> ?X Potential to be anti-competitive. An auction model
> has the potential to favour the existing dominant
> players. Given the current failure of competition at
> the registry level (84% market share by one company)
> this is not the model to use today.
> In short, any supposed benefit from an auction model
> for new domain names has a disproportionate cost due
> to the increased likelihood of market distortions.
> Such an approach is contrary to the public interest
> and therefore contrary to ICANN¡¦s core values."
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827