ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[npoc-voice]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[npoc-voice] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS

  • To: "npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx" <npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [npoc-voice] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
  • From: Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:49:05 -0400

Dear NOOC Colleagues,

You may find these options from the current Drafting Team ointolerance to
our current consultation on the RC position.

Best, Alain

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Avri Doria*
Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for
Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
To: NCSG-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




Begin forwarded message:

*From: *Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx');>>
*Subject: **[gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC
names in new gTLDS*
*Date: *18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
*To: *"gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx');>" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx');>>

 In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find
below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for
moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and
IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:


   1. Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections
   for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of
   second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
   2. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as
   extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset
   of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
   3. Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and wait
   to see if any additional protections may be necessary after the delegation
   of the first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering costs for each
   organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert’s proposal)
   4. Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part of
   a broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
   5. Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to
   substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or
   statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and
   RCRC names by law.


Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at
this time.  Thanks.

Best Regards,

Brian

Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN





-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy