[npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS

[Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry about typos!

It should read:

Dear NPOC Colleagues,

You may find these options from the current Drafting Team of relevance to
our current consultation on the RC position.

Cheers, Alain

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Alain Berranger
<alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Dear NOOC Colleagues,
>
> You may find these options from the current Drafting Team ointolerance to
> our current consultation on the RC position.
>
> Best, Alain
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Avri Doria*
> Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2012
> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for
> Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: **[gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC
> names in new gTLDS*
> *Date: *18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
> *To: *"gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>  In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find
> below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for
> moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and
> IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:
>
>
>    1. Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections
>    for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of
>    second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
>    2. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as
>    extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset
>    of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
>    3. Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and
>    wait to see if any additional protections may be necessary after the
>    delegation of the first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering
>    costs for each organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert’s
>    proposal)
>    4. Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part
>    of a broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
>    5. Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to
>    substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or
>    statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and
>    RCRC names by law.
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at
> this time.  Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, 
> http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
> Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
> NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
> Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
> Skype: alain.berranger
>
>


-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger