<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
- From: Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:03:05 -0400
Hi,
I favor approaches 4 and 5.
NPOC had already indicated its preference for approach 4 back at the San
José GNSO Council meeting.
Also, I'm quite comfortable with Adam's proposed variation on approach 5.
Alain
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: **[gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC
> names in new gTLDS*
> *Date: *18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
> *To: *"gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find
> below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for
> moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and
> IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:
>
>
> 1. Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections
> for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of
> second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
> 2. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as
> extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset
> of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
> 3. Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and
> wait to see if any additional protections may be necessary after the
> delegation of the first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering
> costs for each organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert’s
> proposal)
> 4. Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part
> of a broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
> 5. Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to
> substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or
> statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and
> RCRC names by law.
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at
> this time. Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
>
>
>
--
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|