<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
- To: "'Robert Skelton, CAE'" <rskelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
- From: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:59:33 +0000
ASCD agrees with 4 and 5. However, the legal analysis should be done by an
independent law firm under the direction of the ICANN General Counsel. In
principal, we agree that certain international non governmental organizations
with true global reach and recognition should have special protections. Red
Cross already has special protections outside of the name space and it is not
unreasonable to expect that those protections extend into the name space as
well. As such, the Red Cross' special circumstances must be taken into full
consideration. As this is an issue of first impression, we believe that the
matter needs to be fully vetted and transparent to the community which would
include a substantive legal analysis and proposed implementation policy for the
Red Cross name and similarly situated NGO's.
Lori
Lori S. Schulman · General Counsel
P 703-575-5678 · Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
[Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CBF9FC.C4D5C590]
From: owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Robert Skelton, CAE
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:12 AM
To: Alain Berranger; Avri Doria
Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible
approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
We also agree with Alain.
From: owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Alain Berranger
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:03 AM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [npoc-voice] Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible
approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS
Hi,
I favor approaches 4 and 5.
NPOC had already indicated its preference for approach 4 back at the San José
GNSO Council meeting.
Also, I'm quite comfortable with Adam's proposed variation on approach 5.
Alain
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Avri Doria
<avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brian Peck <brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in
new gTLDS
Date: 18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
To: "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find below a
list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for moving forward
in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and IOC names at the
second level in new gTLDS:
1. Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections for
the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of second-level
reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
2. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as extending
protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset of IOC names
only or, to both sets of each organization's names.
3. Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and wait to
see if any additional protections may be necessary after the delegation of the
first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering costs for each
organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert's proposal)
4. Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part of a
broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
5. Ask ICANN General Counsel's office to conduct a legal analysis to
substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or
statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and RCRC
names by law.
Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at this
time. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Brian
Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN
--
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business,
www.schulich.yorku.ca<http://www.schulich.yorku.ca>
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation,
www.gkpfoundation.org<http://www.gkpfoundation.org>
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation,
www.chasquinet.org<http://www.chasquinet.org>
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824<tel:%2B1%20514%20484%207824>; M:+1 514 704
7824<tel:%2B1%20514%20704%207824>
Skype: alain.berranger
Reprints of the popular EL issue on "Effective Grading" now available in ASCD
Online store. For more info, please contact ASCD at 1-800-933-2723 or (local)
703-575-5609, then press 1.
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is
confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or
have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any
attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|