ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[npoc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[npoc] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] FW: ICANN Launches Accountability Structures Expert Panel, Seeks Community Input

  • To: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [npoc] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] FW: ICANN Launches Accountability Structures Expert Panel, Seeks Community Input
  • From: Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:30:33 -0400

Dear David and Robin:

I dare not respond directly to this message by Mr. Rafik. Debate gets
derailed by personal attack or insinuation. Despite a number of mistakes in
the English language, which does not promote precise or quality arguments,
the intent is clear.  In particular, the personal attack is obvious in the
statement: *"...are you in the same case Alain?". *

By copy to the Ombudsman, I'm filing a complaint on grounds of breach of
article 1.2 d) *"...treating others with dignity, respect, and courtesy..."* of
NCSG Charter.

As a Board Member of a number of organizations - namely CECI and GKPF,
having to practice accountability often there, I obviously take serious
offence in that statement...

David, Robin, I know you are excellent and experienced leaders of NCUC and
NCSG and would ask you to please bring Mr. Rafik to order without delay in
your respective Constituency and Stakeholders' Group. In my opinion, this
must be done on the NCSG-Discuss list as that is the media through which
Mr. Rafik has chosen to make his derogatory personal remarks. Such breach
of standards of member behavior is unworthy of an individual such as Mr.
Rafik with notoriously high status in NCUC, NCSG, GNSO Council and NomCom
Nominee/Appointee. We must ensure the highest standards of member behavior
in our NCSG-Discuss debates.

I do not think running for office as a volunteer in ICANN and acting in the
line of duty as an elected Constituency Head should bring about such abuse
as Mr. Rafik has directed at me.

Thank you for your kind and prompt consideration in this matter,

Best regards

Alain



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] FW: ICANN Launches Accountability Structures
Expert Panel, Seeks Community Input
To: Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


hello,

2012/9/18 Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi All,
>
> Hiring independant experts is a standard organizational process used
> frequently by governments, private sector and NGOs.
>

I don't think that discussion about thus but  more the process established
( in fact no indication what kind of process was followed for hiring and
what were the criteria)

>
> Of course, arm's length experts are more knowledgeable about history,
> framework/context, political issues and ground realities like argued by
> some on this string. But being both an advisor and a stakeholder can be a
> conflict of interest more often than none.
>

a knowledgeable person about ICANN doesn't mean being a stakeholder or
active participant or advocate of specific interests, for example, Berkman
center and LSE made good reports and assessed ICANN in several aspects ..
like accountability without being active in ICANN but they HAVE the
knowledge and they did job in due time. btw how did you assess that those
experts doesn't have any conflict of interests?
and in Multistakeholder organization, I guess everyone is somehow
staekholder de facto nope?

>
> The hiring of independant experts does not take away from or negate
> bottom-up or multi-stakeholder approaches. Bottom-up process does not mean
> than bottom-up views always prevail - it means they are considered by those
> finally accountable (or else what is the difference between a dictatorship
> of the top or a dictatorship of the bottom?).
>

bottom-up dictatorship? there is no such thing, people are just asking the
leadership to be accountable and giving rationale of their decisions, not
judgment here or bashing. it is amazing for me to see how much people in
the top are uncomfortable with accountability and transparency (e.g. I am
observing this in Tunisia with assembly constituent and how elected folks
are not respecting the rules and engagement they made themselves....), are
you in the same case Alain?. the purpose is to make more process
transparent, hiring experts who make assess ICANN accountability is
important matter to be left to obscurity.

>
> The Board is accountable in the end and is free to choose the consultative
> processes they wish as per their judgment and circumstances.
>
>
they are free.. but they can respond to inquiry now and give rationale?  I
think that you are anticipating, we didn't even ask the board yet. we are
just debating and discussing.

Rafik


> I agree with Mary  that the gender balance is inadequate.
>
> Alain
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Poncelet Ileleji <pileleji@xxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Hi Rafik,
>>
>> I totally concur, its important "The Experts" should be  people who
>> understand issues on the ground in regards to ICANN and are fully aware of
>> the global Internet Ecosystem as it has evolved and continues to evolve
>> with ICANN role  and issues regarding Internet Governance as Mary
>> mentioned, to me in as much all these folks are knowledgeable folks in
>> their own right, they will have a lot of literature to go through first and
>> then  face to face dialogue meetings to conduct  before they can give  any
>> expert advice, I do not think that's what is required now.  Well that's my
>> personal  observation.  It will be interesting to see what methodology they
>> shall use in  conducting their assignment as "Experts".
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Poncelet
>>
>>
>> On 17 September 2012 12:21, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Milton,
>>>
>>> it is good question about how ICANN give procurement / hire consultants
>>> for many sensitive issues in not that transparent process.
>>> I don't know how to assess those experts but they seems more familiar to
>>> business/corporate world and their probable lack os knowledge that you
>>> mentioned in details raise questions how they can fit such important
>>> positions.
>>> I do agree with Mary comment too regarding diversity,
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/9/15 Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>>  None of these "experts" knows a thing about Internet governance,
>>>> ICANN's history, ICANN or the political dimension of accountability. This
>>>> is a typical ICANN approach to a sensitive issue, hand-pick a bunch of
>>>> on-paper "experts" through who-knows-what kind of a vetting process who
>>>> will do a whitewash report that is guaranteed not to rock the boat****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11sep12-en.htm*
>>>> ***
>>>> ICANN Launches Accountability Structures Expert Panel, Seeks Community
>>>> Input****
>>>>
>>>> 11 September 2012****
>>>>
>>>> In fulfillment of ATRT Recommendations 23 and 25, calling for a review
>>>> of ICANN's Accountability Structures, ICANN has identified an international
>>>> panel of experts to serve on the Accountability Structures Expert Panel
>>>> (ASEP). Biographies of the experts are available at
>>>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/asep.****
>>>>
>>>> The ASEP is interested in hearing from the ICANN community regarding
>>>> your thoughts on ICANN's accountability structures, particularly the
>>>> Reconsideration process and the Independent Review process, and whether
>>>> they can or should be modified. Your comments and inputs can be submitted
>>>> to ASEP@xxxxxxxxx and comments can be viewed at
>>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/asep/. Please provide your input by 1
>>>> October 2012.****
>>>>
>>>> The ASEP will be posting updates regarding its work, with a detailed
>>>> project plan expected by mid-September. All information regarding the ASEP
>>>> will be accessible from the ASEP page at
>>>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/asep.****
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
>> Coordinator
>> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
>> MDI Road Kanifing South
>> P. O. Box 421 Banjul
>> The Gambia, West Africa
>> Tel: (220) 4370240
>> Fax:(220) 4390793
>> Cell:(220) 9912508
>> Skype: pons_utd
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, 
> http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
> Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
> NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
> Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
> Skype: alain.berranger
>
>
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
> Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
> ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
> destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
> destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
> interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
> reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
> si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
> sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
> votre coopération.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
> This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use
> of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone
> other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
> forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
> distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or
> in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this
> e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and
> destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>



-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger


AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
votre coopération.

CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use
of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone
other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or
in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and
destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy