Re: [ga] ICANN to hire economic consultants to study competition issues
- To: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN to hire economic consultants to study competition issues
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:31:01 -0700
George and all,
Excellent critique here sir. However when it comes to the ICANN
BoD and staff, it will likely be ignored or minimized.
George Kirikos wrote:
> The adopted resolutions of today's Board meeting were just released:
> They're going to hire an outside economic consulting firm to answer
> various competition related questions. Until one sees the report, it's
> unclear whether this is good or bad. One can hire "experts" to say the
> world is flat these days....
> However, given that they seem to continue to plan to give presumptive
> renewal to the existing registry operators, I don't see this
> development as a positive. On the bright side, they didn't approve the
> existing proposed contracts, yet.
> Any economic consultant should study whether consumers would experience
> lower prices if the registry contracts were regularly re-tendered,
> compared to having presumptive renewal, and what the optimal contract
> length would (i.e. 3 years, 5 years, 8 years, etc.).
> Ultimately, ICANN is making this decision more difficult and complex
> than it should be. It's obvious that the maximum public benefit would
> occur if the contracts were of fixed term, and given to the lowest
> bidder for a tender with a baseline of operational
> standards/specifications. Countless government and private contracts
> are bid in this exact same manner, everything from supplying
> paperclips, to outsourcing of call centres, to plane orders. Any other
> solution is not optimal for the public, and begs the question "Why?"
> Using Google as our friend, one can see pages about procurement like:
> and see how many strategic rules and principles ICANN would break, in
> failing to reach an optimal solution in its procurement, should it have
> approved the proposed contracts (and process) to date. Presumptive
> renewal, where the suppliers get to set their own prices, would be
> laughed at as a proposed procurement strategy. That's simply a giveaway
> to the suppliers, and no sane and accountable organization would adopt
> -- they'd be canned on the spot by their superiors.
> George Kirikos
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827