<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
- To: "'Bret Fausett'" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David W. Maher'" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>, <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:08:35 -0400
Bret, I mentioned both in Brussels and on the call that I also coordinate
the denials process at ttpc. I have no relationship to the Registry, but to
the Secretary of TTPC. I provide no advice on registry services. I stated
that in Brussels,but am happy to state it again here.
However, my response to Dave Maher's request about single letter names was
why I mentioned AT&T and Overstock.com on the earlier email.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bret Fausett
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:28 AM
To: David W. Maher; 'Marilyn Cade'; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'John Jeffrey'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
Marilyn? Do your clients with ICANN-related interests extend past AT&T and
Overstock?
-----Original Message-----
From: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>
To: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Marilyn Cade'"
<marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "'John Jeffrey'" <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>; "'Bruce Tonkin'"
<bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 6/8/06 7:06 AM
Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
Yes. In my opinion, her wording is deliberately ambiguous.
David
At 11:24 PM 6/7/2006, Bret Fausett wrote:
>are you suggesting that she has other engagements that she
>hasn't disclosed?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|