RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest

["David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>]

This is still not an adequate response.
First, who is ttpc?
Second, is ttpc your only client, compensated or contingent (beyond 
AT&T and Overstock), that might have an interest in the PDPFEB06?
David

At 11:08 AM 6/8/2006, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> Bret, I mentioned both in Brussels and on the call that I also coordinate
> the denials process at ttpc. I have no relationship to the Registry, but to
> the Secretary of TTPC. I provide no advice on registry services. I stated
> that in Brussels,but am happy to state it again here.
>
> However, my response to Dave Maher's request about single letter names was
> why I mentioned AT&T and Overstock.com on the earlier email.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bret Fausett
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:28 AM
> To: David W. Maher; 'Marilyn Cade'; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'John Jeffrey'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
>
> Marilyn? Do your clients with ICANN-related interests extend past AT&T and
> Overstock?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Marilyn Cade'"
> <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: "'John Jeffrey'" <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>; "'Bruce Tonkin'"
> <bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 6/8/06 7:06 AM
> Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Statements of Interest
>
> Yes. In my opinion, her wording is deliberately ambiguous.
> David
> At 11:24 PM 6/7/2006, Bret Fausett wrote:
> >are you suggesting that she has other engagements that she
> >hasn't disclosed?