Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06: Update

[Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>]

Marilyn

To deal with version control which is always problematic, I will sift  
through all the postings that addressed work schedule issues, speak  
with Maureen as soon as I can and then send around a clean version.

Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 21 Aug 2006, at 14:28, marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Liz, I do not want to agree to a work plan that I have so many  
> concerns about. I saw that philip sheppard also asked abt the  
> practicality of some of the suppositions.
>
> Is there a redrafted version incorporating the changes, in square  
> brackets, so that thr TF and chair can lok at what a modified wk  
> plan would look like?
>
> It makes no sense to force a motion when there is not agreement. I  
> suggest staff provide a revisd version, especialy noting the  
> comments received, perhaps as options, and then Have a sht call  
> chaired by Maureen. If she can dial in next week, we could perhaps  
> have the call on Monday late in the pm fot those members of the tf  
> who are overlapping, early mid day for North America.
>
>
> Regards,
> Marilyn Cade
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:26:30
> To:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06:  Update
>
> Colleagues
>
>
> Further to the 10 August 2006 conference call and subsequent  
> postings to the list, I wanted to confirm that I had received one  
> further suggestion of expert written materials and only one set of  
> comments on the Preliminary Taskforce Report.
>
>
> I have looked at all the postings which relate to a revised work  
> plan and would appreciate very much a final version of that that is  
> agreed by the group.
>
>
> I had suggested that it would be helpful for one of the TF members  
> to propose a motion on the final version and get that seconded, via  
> email, so that I am clear about the expectations of the group.
>
>
> In addition, we also need two motions, again to be approved by  
> email, that confirms the minutes of the two previous meetings.
>
>
> I am conscious that many members of the TF are busily preparing for  
> the Amsterdam meetings but I am reluctant to let the work of the  
> group slip through this week.
>
>
> Kind regards.
>
>
> Liz
>
>
>
>
>
> .....................................................
>
>
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob