Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06: Rapporteur Groups Amendment

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I already have one NCUC volunteer for group A and have requested
consideration for group B. Please let me know how they could join the
groups and/or if (and how best) they can be subscribed to this list,
thanks, Mawaki.

--- Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have extended our invitation to my fellow NCUCers since yesterday
> Friday, and will send a reminder early next week. Let me cross my
> fingers...
> Thanks for the consideration.
> 
> Mawaki
> 
> --- Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 6 okt 2006, at 08.19, Mawaki Chango wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello-
> > >
> > > Madam Chair,
> > > It is unfortunate that seemingly, I am unable to make the time
> > > commitment to meaningfully participate in any one of the
> > rapporteur
> > > group.
> > > So if you could grant me the permission,
> > 
> > Permission?  i don't think such grants are within an interim
> > chair's  
> > purview.
> > ;-)
> > 
> > > I will just remain
> > > plain TF member so to speak.
> > 
> > There is no requirement, at least none that i know of, that you  
> > yourself need to particiapte in a Rapporteur group - though of
> > course  
> > I expect either group would have profited from your attendance.  
> 
> > Perhaps you can find 1 or 2 other members of the NCUC to
> > participate  
> > in your stead. It would be especially helpful if someone who is
> an 
> > 
> > expert in the specific areas under discussion could participate.
> > 
> > > If ever I get a chance, or have a
> > > specific reason, to contribute on one topic or the other, I
> shall
> > do
> > > so where relevant (TF, or either rapporteur group.)
> > 
> > Everything that the sub-groups decide needs to come back into the
> > TF  
> > at large before moving on, so I expect that you will get a chance
> > to  
> > comment on all of it.
> > 
> > thanks
> > a.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>